Represents the system as the continuous time transfer function $H(s)=k \prod_i (s - z[i]) / \prod_j (s - p[j])$
, where $k$
is the :None:None:`gain`, $z$
are the zeros
and $p$
are the :None:None:`poles`. Continuous-time ZerosPolesGain
systems inherit additional functionality from the lti
class.
Changing the value of properties that are not part of the ZerosPolesGain
system representation (such as the :None:None:`A`, :None:None:`B`, :None:None:`C`, :None:None:`D` state-space matrices) is very inefficient and may lead to numerical inaccuracies. It is better to convert to the specific system representation first. For example, call sys = sys.to_ss()
before accessing/changing the A, B, C, D system matrices.
The ZerosPolesGain
class can be instantiated with 1 or 3 arguments. The following gives the number of input arguments and their interpretation:
1:
ltisystem: (StateSpace,TransferFunctionorZerosPolesGain)3: array_like: (zeros, poles, gain)
Continuous-time Linear Time Invariant system in zeros, poles, gain form.
Construct the transfer function $H(s)=\frac{5(s - 1)(s - 2)}{(s - 3)(s - 4)}$ :
>>> from scipy import signal
>>> signal.ZerosPolesGain([1, 2], [3, 4], 5) ZerosPolesGainContinuous( array([1, 2]), array([3, 4]), 5, dt: None )See :
Hover to see nodes names; edges to Self not shown, Caped at 50 nodes.
Using a canvas is more power efficient and can get hundred of nodes ; but does not allow hyperlinks; , arrows or text (beyond on hover)
SVG is more flexible but power hungry; and does not scale well to 50 + nodes.
All aboves nodes referred to, (or are referred from) current nodes; Edges from Self to other have been omitted (or all nodes would be connected to the central node "self" which is not useful). Nodes are colored by the library they belong to, and scaled with the number of references pointing them
