chebwin(*args, **kwargs)
use scipy.signal.windows.chebwin instead.
This window optimizes for the narrowest main lobe width for a given order M and sidelobe equiripple attenuation :None:None:`at`, using Chebyshev polynomials. It was originally developed by Dolph to optimize the directionality of radio antenna arrays.
Unlike most windows, the Dolph-Chebyshev is defined in terms of its frequency response:
$$W(k) = \frac{\cos\{M \cos^{-1}[\beta \cos(\frac{\pi k}{M})]\}} {\cosh[M \cosh^{-1}(\beta)]}$$where
$$\beta = \cosh \left [\frac{1}{M}\cosh^{-1}(10^\frac{A}{20}) \right ]$$and 0 <= abs(k) <= M-1. A is the attenuation in decibels (:None:None:`at`).
The time domain window is then generated using the IFFT, so power-of-two M are the fastest to generate, and prime number M are the slowest.
The equiripple condition in the frequency domain creates impulses in the time domain, which appear at the ends of the window.
Number of points in the output window. If zero or less, an empty array is returned.
Attenuation (in dB).
When True (default), generates a symmetric window, for use in filter design. When False, generates a periodic window, for use in spectral analysis.
The window, with the maximum value always normalized to 1
Return a Dolph-Chebyshev window.
Plot the window and its frequency response:
>>> from scipy import signal
... from scipy.fft import fft, fftshift
... import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>>> window = signal.windows.chebwin(51, at=100)
... plt.plot(window)
... plt.title("Dolph-Chebyshev window (100 dB)")
... plt.ylabel("Amplitude")
... plt.xlabel("Sample")
>>> plt.figure()See :
... A = fft(window, 2048) / (len(window)/2.0)
... freq = np.linspace(-0.5, 0.5, len(A))
... response = 20 * np.log10(np.abs(fftshift(A / abs(A).max())))
... plt.plot(freq, response)
... plt.axis([-0.5, 0.5, -120, 0])
... plt.title("Frequency response of the Dolph-Chebyshev window (100 dB)")
... plt.ylabel("Normalized magnitude [dB]")
... plt.xlabel("Normalized frequency [cycles per sample]")
The following pages refer to to this document either explicitly or contain code examples using this.
scipy.signal.windows._windows.taylor
Hover to see nodes names; edges to Self not shown, Caped at 50 nodes.
Using a canvas is more power efficient and can get hundred of nodes ; but does not allow hyperlinks; , arrows or text (beyond on hover)
SVG is more flexible but power hungry; and does not scale well to 50 + nodes.
All aboves nodes referred to, (or are referred from) current nodes; Edges from Self to other have been omitted (or all nodes would be connected to the central node "self" which is not useful). Nodes are colored by the library they belong to, and scaled with the number of references pointing them